Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jerome Kym vs Patrick Zahraj Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kym vs Zahraj analysis and find out who is favored!
Jerome Kym vs Patrick Zahraj Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kym 2 - 0 Zahraj
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kym has won 54.6% of points on their second serve, while Zahraj has won 44.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kym, in recent form, has won 51.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zahraj has won 53.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.57% and 35.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kym has saved 56.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zahraj has saved 54.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kym has won 72.34% of matches played (W/L 34/ 13), with Zahraj winning 61.43% (W/L 43/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.86% of matches (W/L 22/ 7), where as Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.32% of matches (W/L 43/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kym winning 2 times and Zahraj being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kym winning 4 and Zahraj winning 0. The last match between Kym and Zahraj was at the M15 Villach, 17-05-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jerome Kym getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kym and Zahraj have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kym winning 0 times and Zahraj 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Kym winning 2, and Zahraj 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kym has played against opponents with an average rank of 156.36 while Zahraj has played against players with an average rank of 125.99.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kym has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zahraj has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kym has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zahraj has converted 41.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
444
Rank
348
High
21
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
777
Rank
777
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
66% (95-49)
Career Total W/L
57% (85-63)
74% (23-8)
YTD W/L
56% (15-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jerome Kym | Patrick Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (84/133) | 59% (90/153) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (61/84) | 67% (60/90) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (23/49) | 35% (22/63) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (71/153) | 37% (49/133) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-1 7-6(4) |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
11
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jerome Kym | Patrick Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (23/8) | 56% (15/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (49/18) | 53% (33/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (369/263) | 52% (316/291) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (6/1) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (15/5) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 38% (3/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 171 | 128 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 134 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:51 | 1:46:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 110.9 | 170.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1217/1891) | 60% (1119/1861) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (901/1217) | 68% (760/1119) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (368/674) | 45% (335/742) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (95/247) | 42% (85/203) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (890/2110) | 42% (791/1872) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (20/5) | 58% (15/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (23/30) | 56% (15/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (23/22) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (23/1) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 23% (13/3) |
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Jerome Kym
59%
(
79 of
133)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
15
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
47 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Berk Bugarikj
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Jerome Kym
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
35%
(
16 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tom Gentzsch
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Nico Hipfl
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Jerome Kym
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Matej Dodig
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
8 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
124)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Michele Ribecai
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mariano Tammaro
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Matyas Cerny
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Vincent Marysko
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kym Vs Zahraj Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
